Definición de un escenario de la Empresa 2.0 para el año 2020 en España
Defining a scenario for Enterprise 2.0 by 2020 in Spain

Lucia Illanes Peña. Sevilla (España)

Salvador Bueno Ávila. Sevilla (España)

María D. Gallego Pereira . Sevilla (España)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Artículo completo / Full paper


Definición de un escenario de la Empresa 2.0 para el año 2020 en España
Defining a scenario for Enterprise 2.0 by 2020 in Spain

Lucia Illanes Peña. Sevilla (España)

Salvador Bueno Ávila. Sevilla (España)

María D. Gallego Pereira . Sevilla (España)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resumen / Abstract


El objetivo principal de este trabajo es desarrollar un estudio prospectivo sobre el uso de la tecnología Web 2.0 en las empresas españolas para el año 2020 con el propósito de explicar aquellos factores que estimulan u obstaculizan la implantación de esta tecnología. Partiendo de este objetivo, hemos definido un marco teórico de la Empresa 2.0 donde se define qué es la Empresa 2.0, sus características y principales ventajas.

La metodología aplicada ha sido el método Delphi de dos rondas a través del cual se ha logrado definir un escenario futuro para la Empresa 2.0. Se incluyen en este escenario el análisis de la difusión por zonas geográfica y sector, entre otras dimensiones. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto que la mayor difusión en el horizonte analizado se desarrollará en América del Norte. Además los sectores con mayor difusión serán el turismo y la educación.

Finalmente, los expertos consideran que la mejora de la imagen corporativa es el principal factor crítico de éxito en la implantación de la Web 2.0 en las empresas, y la inexperiencia de los usuarios es considerado como aquel factor que dificultará en mayor medida la implantación.

The aim of this article is to build a forecasting study about the use of Web 2.0 technologies in Spanish companies by 2020 in order to explain which factors stimulate or block the implementation of this type of technologies.Based on this objective, we have defined a theoretical background for Enterprise 2.0 with the intention of analyzing concepts, features, as well as advantages.

We have applied the Delphi method, based on two rounds. With this method, we have reached a future scenario for Enterprise 2.0. Variables regarding the different geographical regions and industries have been used to analyze the diffusion of Web 2.0 technology in companies. As a result of the research, it should be emphasized that the use of Web 2.0 technologies would be increased in North American companies. Furthermore, tourism and education are bound to expand their technologies.

Finally, it is believed that the benefits on the corporate image is the main critical success factor to implement the Web 2.0 technologies in companies, and the inexperienced users are more likely to difficult the implementation.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Palabras Clave / Keywords


Web 2.0, Empresa 2.0, Difusión, Delphi, Prospectiva, Escenario.

Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, diffusion, Delphi, Forecasting, Scenario.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Referencias / References


Ament, R. (1970).Comparison of Delphi forecasting studies in 1964 and 1969.Futures, 2 (1), 35-44.

Analysis and the Delphi Technique.OrganisationalBehaviour and Human Performance, 24, 73-92.

Basset, H. (2013).Enterprise 2.0 and Web 3.0.From Science 2.0 to Pharma3.0,169-193.

Blind, K., Cuhls, K. &Grupp, H. (2001).Personal attitudes in the assessment of thefuture of science and technology: A factor analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68 (2), 131-149.

Brancheau, J.C.; Janz, B. &Wetherbe, J.C. (1996). Key issues in information systems.managements: 1994-1995 SIM Delphi results. MIS Quarterly, 20 (2), 225-242.

Bueno, S. & Salmerón, J.L. (2008). Fuzzy modeling enterprise resource planning tool selection.Computer Standards & Interfaces, 30 (3), 137-147.

Carbone, F., Contreras, J., Hernández, J.Z. &Gomez-Perez, J.M. (2012). Open Innovation in an Enterprise 3.0 framework: Three case studies. Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (10), 8929-8939.

Collins, S. (1977). The oracle at Delphi.Journal of Accountancy (pre-1986), 143 (2),84.

Dalkey, N.C. &Helmer, O. (1963).An experimental application of the Delphimethod to the user of experts.Management Science, 9 (3), 458-67.

Gallego, M.D. & Bueno, S. (2014). Exploring the application of the Delphi method as a forecasting tool in Information Systems and Technologies research, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.26 (9), 987-999.

Gallego, M.D. (2009). El Método Delphi. En Fundamentos de la Prospectiva en Sistemas de Información. Editores: Víctor Amadeo Bañuls y José Luis Salmerón. Ra-Ma.

Gallego, M.D., Bueno, S.& López D. (2014). La Web 2.0: Una visión empresarial y jurídica. España.Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.

Gallego, M.D., Luna, P. & Bueno, S. (2008). Designing a forecasting analysis to understand the diffusion of open source software in the year 2010.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75 (5), 672-686.

Hayne, S. & Pollard, C. (2000). A comparative analysis of critical issues facingCanadian information systems personnel: a national and global perspective.Information & Management, 38 (2), 73-86.

Holzmüller, H. &Schlüchter, J. (2002).Delphi study about the future of B2Bmarketplaces in Germany.Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1(1), 2-19.

ISEA (2008). Empresa 2.0, Análisis prospectivo de las potenciales aplicaciones en las empresas de las tecnologías - web 2.0.

Kameoka, A.; Yokoo, Y. &Kuwahara, T. (2004).A challenge of integratingtechnology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development andpolicymaking.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(6), 579-598.

Keis, M. &Cule, P.E. (1998).A framework for identifying software projects risks.Communication of the ACM, 41(11), 76-83.

Lai, V. & Chung, W. (2002).Managing international data communications.Communications of the ACM, 45 (3),89.

Lai, V. (2001). Issues of international information systems management: aperspective of affiliates. Information& Management, 38 (4), 253-264.

Landeta, J. (1999). El Método Delphi. Una técnica de previsión para la incertidumbre. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.

Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73 (5), 467-482.

Listone H.A. &. Turoff, M. (1975).The Delphi Method.Techniques and Applications.Addison-Wesley.

Martino, J.P. (2003). A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70 (8), 719-733.

Mitchell, V. (1991). The Delphi technique: An exposition and application. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3 (4), 333-358.

Mulligan, P. (1999). Differentiating service tasks for IT application an exploratoryanalysis in financial services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10 (2), 190.

Nambisan, S.; Agarwal, R. &Tanniru, M. (1999).Organizational mechanisms forenhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quarterly, 23 (3),365-396.

Okoli, C. &Pawlowski, S. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example,design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42 (1),15-29.

Riggs, W.E. (1983). The Delphi Technique: An Experimental Evaluation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23, 89-94.

Rohrbaugh, J. (1979). Improving the Quality of Group Judgement: Social Judgement

Rowe, G. & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues andanalysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353-375.

Sigala, M. &Chalkiti, K. (2014).Investigating the exploitation of web 2.0 for knowledge management in the Greek tourism industry: An utilisation–importance analysis.Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 800-812.

Su, C-J, Chiang, C-Y. (2012).Enabling successful Collaboration 2.0: A REST-based Web Service andWeb 2.0 technology oriented information platform for collaborative product development. Computers in Industry, 63 (9), 948-959.

Van Zolingen, S. &Klaassen, C. (2003).Selection processes in a Delphi study aboutkey qualifications in Senior Secondary Vocational Education. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70 (4), 317-340.

Wright, D. (1998). Analysis of the market for access to broadbandtelecommunications in the year 2000.Computers & Operations Research,25(2), 127-138.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cómo citar / How to cite


Illanes Peña, L., Bueno Ávila, S., y Gallego Pereira, M. D. (2015). Definición de un escenario de la Empresa 2.0 para el año 2020 en España. International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies (IJISEBC), Vol. 2, Num. 1, pp. 60-72. Consultado el [dd/mm/aaaa] en www.ijisebc.com