Número completo
Full number
Analysis of the impact about use of a tangible technological interface in a teaching-learning strategy applied during an educational experience
Alfredo Garcia-Suarez. Facultad de Ciencias de la Computación, BUAP, Puebla, México.
Juan Manuel Gonzalez-Calleros. Facultad de Ciencias de la Computación, BUAP, Puebla, México.
Josefina Guerrero-Garcia. Facultad de Ciencias de la Electrónica, BUAP, Puebla, México.
Resumen/Abstract
-
Resumen / Abstract
Recently, various technological tools as educational robots, artificial intelligence platforms, chatbots, audiovisual media, mixed reality, augmented reality, virtual reality, online resources, digital devices, among others have been developed to be applied in the educational field, with the purpose of improving the learning process in students. This research work describes the stages of development of a tangible technological interface that consist of an electronic board that was inspired by a reality show of the Latin American television. This interface was used during an educational experi-ence with high school students and teachers, subsequently an analysis of the experience of each participant in this experiment was carried out. The results show that with the use of the interface, 80% of the expected learning of the classes was achieved with a variation in the data of 15.51, while in the sessions where the use of the interface was not applied, 75% was achieved of the expected learnings with a variation of the data of 59.03. These results reflect that by using the interface in the educational experience, a greater number of students acquire the expected learning effectively.
Palabras Clave/Keywords
-
Palabras Clave / Keywords
Technological tools, Innovation, Electronic board, Teaching-learning, Educational tools.
Referencias/References
-
Referencias / References
1. Ingram, E. Hill, T. W. Harshbarger, D., Keshwani, J.: Improving elementary preservice teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy through garden-based technology integration. Education Sciences 14(1), 65-77 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010065
2. Madsen, S. S., O’Connor, J., Janeš, A., Klančar, A., Brito, R., Demeshkant, N., Konca, A. S., Krasin, S., Saure, H. I., Gjesdal, B., Ludgate, S., Jwaifell, M., Almuhtadi, R., Thorvaldsen, S.: International perspectives on the dynamics of pre-service early childhood teachers’ digital competences. Education Sciences 13(7), 633-658 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070633
3. Kibirige, I.: Primary teachers’ challenges in implementing ICT in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in the post-pandemic era in Uganda. Education Sciences 13(4), 382-395 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040382
4. Nagy, J. T., Dringó-Horváth, I.: Factors influencing university teachers’ technological integration. Education Sciences 14(1), 55-73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010055
5. Kangas, J., Lastikka, A.-L., Arvola, O.: Inclusive play: Defining elements of playful teaching and learning in culturally and linguistically diverse ECEC. Education Sciences 13(9), 956-970 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090956
6. Karalekas, G., Vologiannidis, S., Kalomiros, J.: Teaching machine learning in K–12 using robotics. Education Sciences 13(1), 67-79 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010067
7. Van den Berg, G., du Plessis, E.: ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences 13(10), 998-1010 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
8. Al-Abdullatif, A. M.: Modeling students’ perceptions of chatbots in learning: Integrating technology acceptance with the value-based adoption model. Education Sciences 13(11), 1151-1169 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111151
9. Nicolaou, C., Matsiola, M., Kalliris, G.: Technology-enhanced learning and teaching methodologies through audiovisual media. Education Sciences 9(3), 196-209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030196
10. Budin, S.: Three approaches to using mixed reality simulations for teacher preparation and recruitment of future teachers. Education Sciences 14(1), 75-85 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010075
11. Silva-Díaz, F., Marfil-Carmona, R., Narváez, R., Silva Fuentes, A., Carrillo-Rosúa, J.: Introducing virtual reality and emerging technologies in a teacher training STEM course. Education Sciences 13(10), 1044-1059 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101044
12. Castaño-Calle, R., Jiménez-Vivas, A., Poy Castro, R., Calvo Álvarez, M. I., Jenaro, C.: Perceived benefits of future teachers on the usefulness of virtual and augmented reality in the teaching-learning process. Education Sciences 12(12), 855-866 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120855
13. Townley, A. L., Soares, L. B., Rahimi, R.: Ready or not? A pilot study of graduate students’ and instructors’ perceptions of the effectiveness of online support modules for enhancing academic performance. Education Sciences 13(7), 656-669 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070656
Cómo citar/How to cite
-
Cómo citar / How to cite
Garcia-Suarez, A., Gonzalez-Calleros, J. M., y Guerrero-Garcia, J. (2024). Analysis of the impact about use of a tangible technological interface in a teaching-learning strategy applied during an educational experience. En C. Rusu et al., (1ª ed.), Transformación digital en la educación: innovaciones y desafíos (pp. 11-15). Huelva (España): United Academic Journals (UA Journals). https://doi.org/10.54988/uaj.000029.001
